Louis LaSalle/Fine Art Photography blog

Photography ramblings, circus animals, some filler 

Novel Cover: The Low Road

I've landed another novel cover with Cleis Press for The Low Road by James Lear. I've become the semi-official "face" for the works of James Lear. Friends will recognize that rug. Yes... that was photographed in my living room.  It suffered a bit of a mishap this week -- burrito bowls from Chipotle with guacamole and wool rugs don't mix well. After lots of tedious cleaning, the patient lives. Maybe it's time for its comeback.

Comments [2]

Books: Author Christopher Bram

I mentioned Christopher Bram recently. He's partially responsible for the "circus animals" in the tag line on this blog. I just recently read his books Exiles in America and Gods & Monsters. Both are good reads. Exiles has a somewhat unsettled end, by which I mean that the plot isn't really resolved. But, that's kind of the point of the book, since it's about personal relationships and they are never really resolved, are they. Gods & Monsters is of course the book that inspired the movie, and adds some rich subtext to the story. Christopher Bram has certainly found his own niche -- novels that are gay themed or have a gay subtext for a broader "literary" audience.

   

Comments [0]

Movie: Star Trek

This is a spoiler free posting. It's about generalities, and impressions. Safely read away, even if you haven't seen the movie yet. If you are one of those fans who think canon is gospel and changing Star Trek in any way is heresy. Just stop reading here, because the rest of what I have to say is just going to piss you off.

I love Star Trek. Yes, I'm one of those people who know Spock's blood type (T - negative) and Kirk's beverage of choice (Saurian Brandy), though I don't own a Starfleet uniform and have never worn pointed ears in public (college level theatrical makeup classes don't count). One of the things that has added to the richness of Star Trek over the years has been its efforts to be self consistent. Fans have loving embraced this consistency dubbed "canon". That which occurs on screen is canon, they which does not, isn't. Between all the series and movies, Star Trek's incarnations have had a collective 30 years on the air and 10 movies prior to this one, over a span of 45 years. That provides a very rich tapestry. But like a sailing ship throwing a sail into the water to use as a sea anchor, that rich tapestry of canon has become a boat anchor of uncompromising weight, hamstringing storytelling (sorry about the mixed metaphor). Every successful long term franchise has periodically had to "reset" itself, to keep it fresh, relevant and its storytelling flexible. Superman, Batman, Dr. Who, James Bond... all these have done it, some of them multiple times. Star Trek was long overdue.

I've known they needed to start over with Star Trek for at least 10 years. I've been a strong proponent for a reset. Had it been left to me, I would have gone back to zero and completely ignored canon. Non-fan J.J. Abrams, working with big fan writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman did something far more clever. They acknowledged the existing canon, then side-stepped it by inverting a common plot device for which fans have criticized the series'. Interestingly enough, they accomplished this while canonizing previously non-canonical, but commonly fan accepted details (Uhura's first name, McCoy's reason for joining Starfleet).

Most importantly to fans, is it Star Trek? Meaning, does it have the right tone and feeling? Does it respect the material, the ideals and the characters of the original series? If you can accept that canon has become a boat anchor and that 1960's ideas of what 23rd century technology will look like are dated -- a very much relieved yes! Star Trek has always at it's heart been about two things, about the relationship of its lead characters (the whole is greater than the sum of its parts); and the morality play, teaching a lesson couched as entertainment. This movie is more about the former, showing the foundation of the relationships we grew to love over three seasons and 6 movies. Largely strangers at the start of the film, this is a tight knit crew that at the end have every reason to deeply trust each other. The morality play aspect of classic Star Trek is given a bit of short shift in this initial outing of the franchise reboot. But faint echoes of it are still there, when Kirk is faced with a moral dilemma and chooses to take the high road. In total, the new caretakers of Star Trek have got the words and they've got the music. The tempo has changed, and the lyrics have been updated, but the music is still familiar, comfortable and loved. Equally important, is it any good? A resounding yes! This reset is exciting, fun and fast. I'm looking forward to the next adventure, much more so than I have the last few Trek outings.



Sidebar: This Enterprise feels much larger than it's predecessor. And while not canonical (there's that word again), a VR experience on the official movie website puts this Enterprise's length at 2500 feet with a crew complement of 1100, versus the original's (also non-canoncial) length of 948 feet with a canonical crew complement of 430. To put things in perspective, the contemporary nuclear aircraft carrier U.S.S. Enterprise has a length of 1123 feet and a crew complement of 3500.

The casting and performances in this movie will be endlessly discussed all over the web. Suffice to say that I'm satisfied with the results. The characters are recognizable, the portrayals respectful, but not mimicry. All the beloved are given their moments. Every one of them is shown to be an exceptional individual that belongs on the bridge of the Federation's flagship. Perhaps most surprisingly of all, faced with appearing on screen with Leonard Nimoy, Zachary Quinto acquits himself quite well. The emotions are pitch perfect. 


The movie is not without it's faults - mostly in the art direction. The bright bridge set results in frequent and annoying lens flares. The engine room... well... suffice to say I expect to see a new set in the next outing. Plot-wise a couple of promotions occur in the movie with too convenient ease. The score is largely undistinguished as music to sit and listen to, but serves the action well. The costumes are all beautifully designed, but the shipboard uniforms are largely ill-fitting (though I love the subtle pattern of Starfleet logos).

Most importantly, it's a fun movie, and at the end, our familiar family of characters has been established. And the galaxy is filled with endless possibilities. If this crew has the courage and endurance to give us the 25 years of entertainment the original crew gave us (1966 - 1991), sign me up for the ride.

Comments [1]

Star Trek iPhone Wallpaper

In connection with the release of the new Star Trek movie, working with Paramount Studios, the great folks at IconFactory have done a set of Star Trek icons and phone and desktop wallpapers. They are beautiful work. But the phone wallpapers are a bit plain. So I combined the icons with the wallpapers to create augmented versions.
 
You can find the IconFactory Star Trek stuff here:
http://iconfactory.com/startrek/
 
And Roam around the rest of the IconFactory website to find 10s of thousands of free icons and wallpapers. Lots more Trek stuff, but also every other movie you can imagine and lots of others besides, from the cute and cuddly to the bold and ugly. They've got great icons for everyone from little princesses to geeks and gear heads.

           

Filed under  //   Goodies   Star Trek  

Comments [0]

Hallmark Star Trek Ship Ornaments

Most of my friends know I am a Trekkie from waaaay back! And yes, I can't wait for the premiere of the new movie this Friday!

I've been collecting the Hallmark Star Trek Ornaments since 1992. I missed out on the initial Starship Enterprise release in 1991 because Hallmark massively underestimated demand. I of course eventually picked one up on EBay at an exorbitant price to complete the collection. This year's release is the Klingon K'Tinga Battlecruiser, introduced in the opening scene of 1979's Star Trek - The Motion Picture (this is of course, the 30th anniversary of that movie).


The full history of the Star Trek ship ornaments*:
1991 - Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 (TOS)
1992 - Shuttlecraft Galileo (TOS era)
1993 - Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D (TNG)
1994 - Klingon Bird of Prey (TOS Movies onward)
1995 - Romulan Warbird (TNG)
1996 - Starship U.S.S. Voyager (Voyager)
1997 - Starship U.S.S. Defiant (DS9)
1998 - Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-E (TNG Movies)
1999 - Runabout U.S.S. Rio Grande (DS9)
2000 - Borg Cube (TNG)
2001 - Space Station Deep Space Nine (DS9)
2002 - Delta Flyer (Voyager)
2003 - Romulan Scorpion (TNG Movie - Nemesis)
2004 - Vulcan Command Ship (Enterprise)
2005 - Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-A (TOS Movies)
2006 - TOS 40th Anniversary U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 (essentially a reissue of the first ornament)
2007 - Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D Future (TNG series finale)
2008 - Starship U.S.S. Reliant (TOS Move - The Wrath of Khan)
2009 - Klingon K'Tinga Battlecruiser (TOS Movies)
* These are the Star Trek ships Hallmark released as Christmas Tree ornaments in the ship line. They also released several ships over the years that were intended as desktop displays.

And almost as exciting, this year Hallmark will also be releasing a Robby the Robot from the classic science fiction film Forbidden Planet

Filed under  //   Fun Products   Goodies   Star Trek  

Comments [2]

Photo Shoot: Eric Gordon

The second model I worked with in San Diego is Eric Gordon. I first worked with Eric in the spring of 1996. That work needs to be rescanned from the negatives, so don't bother trying to find it, it's not on my website at the moment. But we've continued to occasionally work together over the years. We worked together again in 2000, then last year in 2008, and now in 2009. Eric's really easy to work with, off-the-wall and irreverent. We always have a lot of fun. More to follow when I get the shoot edited.
 
For those interested in taking a look at the previous shoot, you can find them on my web site here:
http://www.louislasalle.com/Assets001/Photos/Eric_Gordon/Shoot1/index.htm

Filed under  //   Eric Gordon   Photo Shoot  

Comments [1]

Photo Shoot: Damon Danilo

Hot off the presses! I'm in San Diego this weekend doing a couple of photo shoots. I'm getting to work with Damon Danilo again. Last time we worked together he was totally exhausted and still we got amazing work. This time I got to work with him fresh and he's stellar. More to follow in the weeks and months ahead when I get the photo shoot edited. For those interested in taking a look at the previous shoot, you can find them on my web site here:
http://www.louislasalle.com/Assets001/Photos/Damon_Danilo/Shoot1/index.htm

Filed under  //   Damon Danilo   Photo Shoot  

Comments [1]

"... the oxymoron that is for profit journalism..."

Yesterday I heard a report on the radio about the possible elimination of Public Access TV in San Francisco due to the current budget crisis and state law changing control of cable franchises from local to state control. As a result there is a drastic drop in available funding for the Public Access channel. 


One speaker in her support of Public Access talked about Public Access being an antidote to "the oxymoron that is for profit journalism". That gave me pause. I have a great deal of respect for those people who feel so passionately about an under reported topic that they will dedicate their personal time and money to being heard through Public Access. But I had to wonder, does this woman really, honestly, believe that amateurs who have sufficient passion about a topic to at their own time and expense produce a program are going to be less biased than professional journalists with editors, style guides and codes of ethics?

Mind you, I'm not saying for profit journalism is completely unbiased (FOX has destroyed any possibility of anyone thinking that again), but the idea that an impassioned amateur, not backed up by any system of checks and balances would be less biased than the professional struck me as at least humorous, and certainly displaying a lack of self awareness on the part of the speaker.
Filed under  //   Commentary   Politics  

Comments [0]

What I'm Reading: Drood by Dan Simmons

I just finished Drood by Dan Simmons, best known for his Hyperion Cantos cycle of four books, which begins with the Hugo award winning Hyperion and concludes with The Rise of Endymion.  Drood presents a fictionalized account of the last 5 years of Charles Dickens life. The story is told in the first person of William "Wilkie" Collins, friend, protege, collaborator and rival of Dickens, as well as being an extreme opium addict. The story begins the day Charles Dickens is involved in a near fatal railway accident and follow through to the day he dies, exactly 5 years later. On the fateful day of the railway accident, Dickens encounters a ghoul of man named simply "Drood", who becomes and ongoing obsession for the author, who drags his friend Wilkie into the mystery. In the ensuing years, the mystery grows darker and deeper, taking a toll on the health and perhaps even the sanity of both men.

Inspired by the intriguing events surrounding Charles Dickens last years (dying 5 years to the day after escaping death in a railway accident) and the fact the Dickens left behind an mystery novel, Simmons draws engrossing biographical sketches of both Dickens and Collins. And using them as both eyes and tour guides, takes the readers into the awful underbelly of 19th century London that are only hinted at in the romanticized novels of Dickens.

This is definitely a "door stop" book, topping nearly 800 pages, as are most of Simmons books. But like his other novels, the destination is worth the journey and the journey is the thing. Simmons is a highly literate author, who frequently uses classical sources for both structure, theme and even characters of his novels. These are not light weight pulp, but neither is Simmons a pretentious writer who insists on using an obscure 5 syllable word when a common 3 syllable word will do.

Drood isn't my favorite Simmons book; I'd have to reserve that honor for the Ilium & Olympos duology. But it is fine thriller, which gives insight into a London much darker than we could have imagined it, as it struggled to become a modern city.

Filed under  //   What I'm Reading  

Comments [2]

Inner Beauty - Susan Boyle: Singer

I recently heard a midlife crisis described as being that fear that you are all you are ever going to be. Well this 47 year old woman from Scotland has proved that whatever our age, we can exceed our previous selves by absolute leaps and bounds!

Comments [0]